<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kelby Carr &#187; online conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kelbycarr.com/tag/online-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kelbycarr.com</link>
	<description>Social media consultant, speaker, pioneer of the social blog, founder and CEO of Type-A Parent and Type-A Parent Conference, social networking online since 1984</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networking Burn-Out</title>
		<link>http://kelbycarr.com/social-networking-burn-out/</link>
		<comments>http://kelbycarr.com/social-networking-burn-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelby Carr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niche social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kelbycarr.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing a pretty sudden and pretty prominent trend in social networking: social networking burn-out. As great as Web 2.0 is, it isn&#8217;t that surprising that people are burning out on it. There was a ton of attention when gapingvoid posted a funny cartoon about time being consumed tweeting in the post, &#8220;Why I Deleted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing a pretty sudden and pretty prominent trend in social networking: social networking burn-out. As great as Web 2.0 is, it isn&#8217;t that surprising that people are burning out on it. There was a ton of attention when gapingvoid posted a funny cartoon about time being consumed tweeting in the post, &#8220;<a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/004480.html">Why I Deleted my Twitter Account</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<ul>
<li>Something new happens. Everyone thinks it&#8217;s cool. Reports say you simply MUST be doing it. So people and companies and organizations jump on board.</li>
<li>Then they realize something: you need to actually socialize to do social networking. So it&#8217;s manpower intensive if you&#8217;re an organization, and it&#8217;s a time-sucker if you&#8217;re a human.</li>
<li>People want to be cool online, and they think they can do that by being friends with everyone. But it&#8217;s hard to be in EVERY clique. That&#8217;s why cliques exist. So you can focus.</li>
<li>They try to connect on several levels and several locations, and just can&#8217;t stand to spend another minute socializing.</li>
</ul>
<p>So here&#8217;s what I expect to happen next. Companies who were nervous about dabbling in this realm to begin with will see this emerging trend as a sign they were right all along, and this whole social web/Web 2.0 thing was just a passing fad.</p>
<p>They will be wrong.</p>
<p>What will happen is that social networking will settle in. People will find their social niches and favorite sites, and they will ignore the other &#8220;cliques.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then some of the big guys will level off on traffic, slow down or be bought out by other sites. The smaller, niche social networks will become even more popular.</p>
<p>People will keep socializing because that&#8217;s how the web has evolved. How and where they will socialize is what will change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kelbycarr.com/social-networking-burn-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

